summary
Introduced
01/13/2022
01/13/2022
In Committee
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
Crossed Over
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
Passed
Dead
04/11/2022
04/11/2022
Introduced Session
2022 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Requiring a law enforcement officer who takes a child into custody, interrogates or charges a child with a criminal violation to provide reasonable notice to the child's parents, guardian, or custodian; requiring the notice to include the child's location, the reason for the custody action, and instructions on how to make in-person contact; prohibiting the interrogation of a child by a law enforcement officer until the child has consulted with a certain attorney and a notice has been provided to the child's parents, guardian or custodian; etc.
AI Summary
This bill, the Juvenile Law - Child Interrogation Protection Act, proposes several key provisions:
1. Requires law enforcement officers to provide reasonable notice, including the child's location, reason for custody, and instructions for in-person contact, to a child's parents, guardian, or custodian when the child is taken into custody.
2. Prohibits law enforcement from interrogating a child until the child has consulted with an attorney, either retained by the parent/guardian or provided by the Office of the Public Defender, and the law enforcement officer has made a reasonable effort to notify the child's parent/guardian.
3. Establishes a rebuttable presumption that a child's statement made during a custodial interrogation without complying with the consultation and notification requirements is inadmissible, though the state can overcome this by showing the statement was made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
4. Requires law enforcement agencies to maintain records of their notification efforts and the attorney consulted, and directs the Office of the Public Defender to provide guidance and a list of available attorneys to assist children.
5. Clarifies that the bill's requirements apply regardless of whether the child is considered a juvenile or charged as an adult.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (15)
Sandy Bartlett (D)*,
Heather Bagnall (D),
Jon Cardin (D),
Mark Chang (D),
Charlotte Crutchfield (D),
Debra Davis (D),
Wanika Fisher (D),
Shaneka Henson (D),
Mary Lehman (D),
Brooke Lierman (D),
Joseline Peña-Melnyk (D),
Mike Rogers (D),
Sheila Ruth (D),
Nicole Williams (D),
C.T. Wilson (D),
Last Action
Referred Rules (on 03/31/2022)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/HB0269?ys=2022RS |
| Floor Amendment 913328/1 (Delegate Griffith) Rejected (44-90) | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2022RS/amds/bil_0009/hb0269_91332801.pdf |
| Floor Amendment 723020/1 (Delegate Buckel) Rejected (44-90) | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2022RS/amds/bil_0009/hb0269_72302001.pdf |
| BillText | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2022RS/bills/hb/hb0269t.pdf |
| Favorable with Amendments 193124/1 Adopted | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2022RS/amds/bil_0009/hb0269_19312401.pdf |
| Vote Image | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2022RS/votes_comm/hb0269_jud.pdf |
| BillText | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2022RS/bills/hb/hb0269f.pdf |
Loading...