Bill

Bill > AR192


NJ AR192

NJ AR192
Urges United States Supreme Court to overturn lower court opinion allowing domestic violence abusers to possess firearms.


summary

Introduced
06/28/2023
In Committee
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Signed/Enacted/Adopted
06/30/2023

Introduced Session

2022-2023 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This resolution respectfully requests the United States Supreme Court to overturn the decision of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Rahimi, 61 F.4th 443 (5th Cir. 2023), allowing domestic violence abusers to possess firearms. Guns and domestic violence are a lethal combination. Nearly half of all women murdered in the United States are killed by a current or former intimate partner, and more than half of these intimate partner homicides are by firearm. Women are five times more likely to be murdered by an abusive partner when the abuser has access to a gun. The mere presence of a gun increases the risk of domestic violence homicide by 500 percent. When a victim of domestic violence attempts to take adverse action against their partner by leaving the relationship or obtaining a restraining order is when they are in the most danger. In fact, one-fifth of homicide victims with restraining orders are murdered within two days of obtaining the order and one-third are murdered within the first month. This is why it is critical to make sure that persons who commit domestic violence and other acts of violence against intimate partners should have their access to weapons restricted. On March 2, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in Rahimi that the federal law banning possession of a firearm by a person subject to a domestic violence protective order is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The federal law, 18 U.S.C. s.922(g)(8), has been in effect since 1994. A domestic violence protective order was issued in February 2020 against the defendant in the case, Texas resident Zackey Rahimi, after he assaulted his former girlfriend. The protective order that barred Rahimi from contact with the victim expressly prohibited him from possessing a firearm. Despite the protective order and the federal law barring Rahimi from possessing a firearm, he had a pistol and a rifle, and was alleged to be responsible for five separate shootings in Texas between December 2020 and January 2021. The decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals holding the federal law unconstitutional was prompted by a June 2022 United States Supreme Court decision, N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022). In Bruen, the Supreme Court struck down a New York state law that required a person to prove "proper cause" in order to obtain a license to carry a concealed firearm, ruling that the "proper cause" requirement violated the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which grants "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms." The Solicitor General of the United States has urged the Supreme Court to reverse the appeals court decision in Rahimi because it "threatens grave harms for victims of domestic violence." In the view of this House, the Rahimi decision, if not struck down, would destroy an important law protecting the public safety and would endanger the lives of thousands of domestic violence survivors.

AI Summary

This Resolution respectfully urges the United States Supreme Court to overturn a recent decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of *United States v. Rahimi*. The Fifth Circuit ruled that a federal law, in place since 1994, which prohibits individuals subject to domestic violence protective orders from possessing firearms, is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. This resolution highlights the dangerous connection between firearms and domestic violence, noting that intimate partner homicides are frequently committed with guns and that the risk of homicide increases significantly when an abuser has access to a firearm, especially when a victim attempts to leave or obtain a restraining order. The resolution explains that the Fifth Circuit's decision was influenced by a prior Supreme Court ruling, *N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen*, which struck down a New York law requiring "proper cause" to carry a concealed firearm. The resolution expresses concern that the *Rahimi* decision, if not reversed, would undermine public safety and endanger domestic violence survivors, and therefore calls for the Supreme Court to uphold the federal law restricting firearm access for those with domestic violence protective orders.

Sponsors (4)

Last Action

Filed with Secretary of State (on 06/30/2023)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...