Bill

Bill > A4467


NJ A4467

NJ A4467
Codifies and expands "rescue doctrine" to permit recovery of damages by certain rescuers.


summary

Introduced
06/03/2024
In Committee
06/03/2024
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
01/12/2026

Introduced Session

2024-2025 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This bill codifies and expands the "rescue doctrine." Under New Jersey case law, the "rescue doctrine" allows a rescuer to recover damages for injuries sustained when trying to rescue a person who is at fault, or partially at fault, for creating the peril that invited rescue. The bill would permit rescuers to recover damages for injuries that the rescuer sustained because a culpable party placed themselves or, in an expansion of the doctrine, property in a perilous position that invited rescue as a result of the culpable party's tortious conduct. The supplement to current law included in this bill incorporates the findings of the New Jersey Law Revision Commission (Commission), as set forth in its Final Report concerning The Rescue Doctrine, issued December 15, 2022. The Commission found that a majority of states follow the definition of the "rescue doctrine" set forth in the Restatement (Third) of Torts, which includes rescue of both persons and property. The bill brings New Jersey law into conformity with the majority of states. The legislative recommendations of the Commission's Final Report were largely in response to the New Jersey Supreme Court decision in Samolyk v. Berthe, 251 N.J. 73 (2022). In Samolyk, the plaintiff attempted to rescue a neighbor's dog from drowning, which resulted in the plaintiff sustaining permanent neurological and cognitive injuries. In Samolyk, the Court was asked to consider the "rescue doctrine" in the context of those who voluntarily choose to expose themselves to significant danger in an effort to safeguard the property of another, in this case, the dog. Although the Court declined to expand the "rescue doctrine" to include injuries sustained to protect property, it did recognize that "[t]he rescue doctrine 'has long been a part of [New Jersey's] social fabric'." Samolyk v. Berthe, 251 N.J. 73, 80 (2022) (quoting Saltsman v. Corazo, 371 N.J. Super. 237, 248 (App. Div. 1998) (noting that in New Jersey the doctrine has been historically used to address situations in which the rescuer sued the party whose negligence placed the victim in a position of imminent peril, thereby necessitating the rescue)).

AI Summary

This bill codifies and expands the "rescue doctrine" in New Jersey law. The rescue doctrine allows a rescuer to recover damages for injuries sustained when trying to rescue a person or property that was placed in a perilous position due to the tortious conduct of a culpable party. The bill incorporates findings from the New Jersey Law Revision Commission, which recommended aligning New Jersey's law with the majority of states by including the rescue of both persons and property within the scope of the doctrine. The bill is a legislative response to the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in Samolyk v. Berthe, which did not expand the doctrine to include the rescue of property.

Committee Categories

Military Affairs and Security

Sponsors (1)

Last Action

Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness Committee (on 06/03/2024)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...