Bill
Bill > HB64
PA HB64
PA HB64Prohibiting the penalization of employees for nonparticipation in religious or political matters; providing for notice requirements; establishing the Captive Audience Meeting Enforcement Fund; and imposing penalties.
summary
Introduced
01/14/2025
01/14/2025
In Committee
01/14/2025
01/14/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2025-2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Prohibiting the penalization of employees for nonparticipation in religious or political matters; providing for notice requirements; ESTABLISHING THE CAPTIVE AUDIENCE MEETING <-- ENFORCEMENT FUND; and imposing penalties.
AI Summary
This bill, known as the Employee Protection from Captive Audience Meeting Act, prohibits employers from penalizing or taking adverse action against employees for declining to attend or participate in employer-sponsored meetings or communications that express the employer's opinions on religious or political matters, or for reporting suspected violations of this prohibition. It defines "political matter" broadly to include elections, political parties, and proposals to change laws or regulations, and "religious matter" to encompass beliefs, affiliations, practices, or support for religious organizations. The bill allows employees to sue employers for violations, seeking remedies like back pay and reinstatement, and mandates that employers post notices informing employees of their rights under the act within 30 days of its effective date, with the Department of Labor and Industry also providing such notices online. The Department of Labor and Industry is empowered to investigate complaints and can assess administrative fines of up to $2,500 per employee for a first violation and up to $5,000 per employee for subsequent violations, with all collected fines deposited into a new Captive Audience Meeting Enforcement Fund to support the act's enforcement. The bill includes exceptions, such as not prohibiting legally required communications, voluntary meetings, job-essential information, requirements for managerial staff, academic discussions at higher education institutions, or government agency communications about public policy proposals, and it also clarifies that it does not prohibit mandatory anti-discrimination training or labor organizations' access to employees for discussions under collective bargaining agreements.
Committee Categories
Labor and Employment
Sponsors (23)
Tarik Khan (D)*,
Jessica Benham (D),
Joe Ciresi (D),
Jason Dawkins (D),
Kyle Donahue (D),
Elizabeth Fiedler (D),
Dan Frankel (D),
Bob Freeman (D),
Roni Green (D),
Jim Haddock (D),
Carol Hill-Evans (D),
John Inglis (D),
Malcolm Kenyatta (D),
Rob Matzie (D),
Dan Miller (D),
Danielle Otten (D),
Chris Pielli (D),
Lindsay Powell (D),
Chris Rabb (D),
Ben Sanchez (D),
Mike Schlossberg (D),
Josh Siegel (D),
Arvind Venkat (D),
Last Action
Laid on the table (on 03/23/2026)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/bill_history.cfm?syear=2025&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=64 |
| House Amendment A02258 (PN 0053) | https://www.palegis.us/legislation/amendments/text/2025/0/A02258 |
| BillText | https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/text/PDF/2025/0/HB0064/PN3056 |
| BillText | https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&sessYr=2025&sessInd=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=0064&pn=0053 |
Loading...