summary
Introduced
01/13/2025
01/13/2025
In Committee
01/27/2025
01/27/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
06/27/2025
06/27/2025
Introduced Session
2025 Legislative Measures
Bill Summary
The statement includes a measure digest written in compliance with applicable readability standards. Digest: Says that a person may not claim a good effect on the environment from the person or the person’s products or services if the claim is not true. Says that a violation is a bad practice under the UTPA and that the person can get sued for $200 for the violation. (Flesch Readability Score: 61.5). Prohibits a person from publishing or causing to be published an environmental marketing claim, net zero claim or reputational advertising that is materially false, misleading, deceptive or fraudu- lent. Specifies what constitutes a materially false, misleading, deceptive or fraudulent environmental marketing claim or net zero claim or reputational advertising. Punishes a violation of the Act as an unlawful trade practice under the Unlawful Trade Prac- tices Act and subjects the violator to statutory damages of $200 if a plaintiff can prove exposure to the claim or advertising and that the plaintiff purchased a product or service from the person based on the claim or advertising. Declares an emergency, effective on passage.
AI Summary
This bill addresses greenwashing by establishing strict guidelines for environmental marketing claims, net zero claims, and reputational advertising in Oregon. The legislation defines key terms like "environmental marketing claim" as any public representation that a product or service benefits the natural environment, and "net zero claim" as a specific representation about achieving a balance between greenhouse gas emissions and removals. The bill prohibits publishing claims that are materially false, misleading, deceptive, or fraudulent, with detailed criteria for determining what constitutes such a claim. For instance, a claim might be considered false if it omits critical information, lacks scientific evidence, is overly broad, or fails to disclose potential environmental trade-offs. Importantly, any person found in violation of these provisions would be subject to an unlawful trade practice designation and could be liable for up to $200 in damages to a plaintiff who purchased a product based on the misleading claim. The bill also amends existing trade practice laws to explicitly include these new environmental marketing restrictions and declares an emergency, meaning the law would take effect immediately upon passage. By creating these detailed standards, the bill aims to protect consumers from potentially deceptive environmental marketing practices and promote more transparent and accurate environmental claims by businesses.
Committee Categories
Agriculture and Natural Resources, Justice
Sponsors (8)
Jeff Golden (D)*,
James Manning (D)*,
Wlnsvey Campos (D),
Lew Frederick (D),
Chris Gorsek (D),
Deb Patterson (D),
Floyd Prozanski (D),
Kathleen Taylor (D),
Last Action
In committee upon adjournment. (on 06/27/2025)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...