summary
Introduced
02/05/2025
02/05/2025
In Committee
05/07/2025
05/07/2025
Crossed Over
04/07/2025
04/07/2025
Passed
05/22/2025
05/22/2025
Dead
Introduced Session
104th General Assembly
Bill Summary
Amends the Stalking No Contact Order Act. Adds to the definition of "stalking" to include harassment that is conduct that is not necessary to accomplish a purpose that is reasonable under the circumstances, would cause a reasonable person emotional distress, and causes emotional distress to the petitioner. Creates a rebuttable presumption that the following conduct is presumed to cause emotional distress: (i) creating a disturbance at the petitioner's place of employment or school; (ii) repeatedly telephoning the petitioner's place of employment, home, or residence; (iii) repeatedly following the petitioner about in a public place or places; (iv) repeatedly keeping the petitioner under surveillance by remaining present outside his or her home, school, place of employment, vehicle, or other place occupied by the petitioner or by peering in the petitioner's windows; (v) threatening the safety of the petitioner's minor child or family member; or (vi) threatening physical force, confinement, or restraint on one or more occasions. Effective immediately.
AI Summary
This bill amends the Stalking No Contact Order Act to expand the definition of "stalking" and create clearer guidelines for what constitutes harassment and emotional distress. The bill adds a rebuttable presumption of emotional distress for specific behaviors, including creating disturbances at a person's workplace or school, repeatedly calling a person's home or workplace after being asked to stop, following someone in public, surveilling them by repeatedly being near their home or workplace, threatening the safety of their minor child or family member, and threatening physical force or restraint. The definition of stalking is broadened to include harassment that is unnecessary, would cause a reasonable person emotional distress, and actually causes emotional distress to the petitioner. The bill maintains exceptions for lawful free speech and assembly, specifically protecting labor-related activities such as monitoring workplace safety and lawful picketing related to labor disputes. By creating these more explicit definitions and presumptions, the bill aims to provide clearer legal protections for individuals experiencing stalking and harassment, making it easier to obtain protective orders and demonstrate the harmful impact of such behaviors.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (27)
Jen Gong-Gershowitz (D)*,
Mike Halpin (D)*,
Jaime Andrade (D),
Diane Blair-Sherlock (D),
Terri Bryant (R),
Kelly Cassidy (D),
Sharon Chung (D),
Terra Costa Howard (D),
Martha Deuter (D),
Laura Faver Dias (D),
Dale Fowler (R),
Nicolle Grasse (D),
Angelica Guerrero-Cuellar (D),
Erica Harriss (R),
Maura Hirschauer (D),
Gregg Johnson (D),
Tracy Katz Muhl (D),
Stephanie Kifowit (D),
Joyce Mason (D),
Michelle Mussman (D),
Suzanne Ness (D),
Rick Ryan (D),
Anne Stava-Murray (D),
Katie Stuart (D),
Curtis Tarver (D),
Dave Vella (D),
Ann Williams (D),
Last Action
Passed Both Houses (on 05/22/2025)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Document Type | Source Location |
---|---|
State Bill Page | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=2873&GAID=18&DocTypeID=HB&SessionID=114&GA=104 |
BillText | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/104/HB/10400HB2873enr.htm |
BillText | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/104/HB/10400HB2873eng.htm |
House Amendment 002 | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/104/HB/10400HB2873ham002.htm |
House Amendment 001 | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/104/HB/10400HB2873ham001.htm |
BillText | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/104/HB/10400HB2873.htm |
Loading...