summary
Introduced
02/06/2025
02/06/2025
In Committee
02/06/2025
02/06/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
104th General Assembly
Bill Summary
Creates the Stop Abusive Website Access Litigation Act. Authorizes the Attorney General, on behalf of a class of residents, that is subject to litigation that alleges any website access violation to file a civil action in a State court against the party, attorney, or law firm that initiated the litigation for a determination as to whether this is abusive litigation. Provides that in determining whether the litigation alleging a website access violation constitutes abusive litigation, the trier of fact shall consider the totality of the circumstances to determine if the primary purpose of the litigation that alleges a website access violation is obtaining a payment from a defendant because of the costs of defending the action in court. Creates criteria for the trier of act to determine if the litigation is abusive under the Act. Provides that if the trier of fact determines that the litigation qualifies as abusive litigation under the Act, the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the defendant. Provides that the court may also award punitive damages not to exceed 3 times the amount of attorney's fees awarded by the court.
AI Summary
This bill, known as the Stop Abusive Website Access Litigation Act, aims to address what it considers to be frivolous lawsuits related to website accessibility under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The bill allows the Attorney General or a resident of Illinois to file a civil action against a party, attorney, or law firm that initiates a website access violation lawsuit to determine if the litigation is abusive. When evaluating whether a lawsuit is abusive, the court will consider various factors, including the number of similar actions filed by the plaintiff, whether there was a good-faith attempt to resolve the issue before litigation, the defendant's resources, and the practicality of the lawsuit's jurisdiction. If a defendant attempts to remedy the alleged website accessibility violation within 90 days of receiving notice, there is a presumption that continued litigation is abusive. The bill provides protections for small businesses by considering factors like the number of employees and resources available to correct the violation. If the court determines the litigation is abusive, it may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the defendant, and can even impose punitive damages up to three times the amount of attorney's fees. The bill defines a website access violation as an allegation that a public accommodation (including websites operated by Illinois residents) does not provide sufficient accessibility under the ADA.
Sponsors (1)
Last Action
Referred to Assignments (on 02/06/2025)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Document Type | Source Location |
---|---|
State Bill Page | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=1942&GAID=18&DocTypeID=SB&SessionID=114&GA=104 |
BillText | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/104/SB/10400SB1942.htm |
Loading...