Bill
Bill > HB1346
MD HB1346
MD HB1346Criminal Procedure - Evidence - Protecting the Admissibility of Creative Expression (PACE Act)
summary
Introduced
02/07/2025
02/07/2025
In Committee
02/07/2025
02/07/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
04/08/2025
04/08/2025
Introduced Session
2025 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Establishing that the creative expression of a criminal defendant or juvenile respondent is not admissible against the defendant or respondent unless the court makes certain findings; establishing that the creative expression of a defendant or respondent is admissible in juvenile proceedings for certain purposes; and defining "creative expression" to mean the expression or application of creativity or imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, sounds, words, movements, or symbols.
AI Summary
This bill, known as the Protecting the Admissibility of Creative Expression (PACE) Act, establishes new rules for how creative expression can be used as evidence in criminal and juvenile legal proceedings. The bill defines "creative expression" broadly to include various art forms like music, dance, visual art, poetry, literature, and film, and creates a high legal standard for when such creative works can be admitted as evidence against a defendant. Specifically, a court can only admit creative expression as evidence if it can prove by clear and convincing evidence that: the defendant intended the work to be literal rather than fictional, the expression directly refers to the specific facts of the alleged offense, is relevant to a disputed fact, and has probative value that cannot be obtained through other evidence. The bill also includes a provision allowing creative expression to be used in juvenile cases for evaluating mental health services or diversion programs. This legislation aims to protect artists and performers from having their creative works used against them in legal proceedings by requiring a stringent review process before such works can be considered as evidence, recognizing that artistic expression is often metaphorical, imaginative, and not meant to be interpreted literally.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (29)
Marlon Amprey (D)*,
Gabriel Acevero (D),
Adrian Boafo (D),
Christopher Bouchat (R),
Frank Conaway (D),
Charlotte Crutchfield (D),
Debra Davis (D),
Elizabeth Embry (D),
Kris Fair (D),
Kevin Harris (D),
Julian Ivey (D),
Robbyn Lewis (D),
Jeff Long (D),
Ashanti Martínez (D),
Aletheia McCaskill (D),
Scott Phillips (D),
Kent Roberson (D),
Malcolm Ruff (D),
Sheila Ruth (D),
Gary Simmons (D),
Karen Simpson (D),
Stephanie Smith (D),
Kym Taylor (D),
Karen Toles (D),
Chris Tomlinson (R),
Veronica Turner (D),
Jheanelle Wilkins (D),
Nicole Williams (D),
Caylin Young (D),
Last Action
House Judiciary Hearing (13:00:00 3/11/2025 ) (on 03/11/2025)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/HB1346?ys=2025RS |
| BillText | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2025RS/bills/hb/hb1346f.pdf |
Loading...