Bill

Bill > H5913


RI H5913

RI H5913
Provides that an agreement resolving a patent infringement claim, in connection with the sale of a pharmaceutical product, is to be presumed to have anticompetitive effects if a nonreference drug filer receives anything of value.


summary

Introduced
02/28/2025
In Committee
02/28/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
06/20/2025

Introduced Session

2025 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This act would provide that an agreement resolving or settling, on a final or interim basis, a patent infringement claim, in connection with the sale of a pharmaceutical product, is to be presumed to have anticompetitive effects if a nonreference drug filer receives anything of value, as defined, from another company asserting patent infringement and if the nonreference drug filer agrees to limit or forego research, development, manufacturing, marketing, or sales of the nonreference drug filer’s product for any period of time, as specified. The act would provide various exceptions to this prohibition, including, among others, if the agreement has directly generated procompetitive benefits and the procompetitive benefits of the agreement outweigh the anticompetitive effects of the agreement. The act would make a violation of these provisions punishable by a civil penalty that is recoverable only in a civil action brought by the attorney general, as specified. This act would take effect upon passage.

AI Summary

This bill establishes new regulations to prevent anticompetitive practices in pharmaceutical patent settlements, specifically targeting agreements between brand-name drug manufacturers and generic drug manufacturers that potentially delay generic drug market entry. The legislation creates a presumption that certain patent settlement agreements are anticompetitive if a generic or biosimilar drug manufacturer (nonreference drug filer) receives anything of value from the brand-name drug manufacturer and agrees to limit or delay the introduction of their competing product. The bill requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to disclose such arrangements to the attorney general within 30 days and imposes significant civil penalties for violations, with potential fines up to $20 million or three times the value received from the agreement. The law defines numerous terms related to drug applications, patent claims, and pharmaceutical markets, and provides detailed guidelines for determining whether a settlement agreement has anticompetitive effects. Notably, the bill allows some exceptions for settlements that can demonstrate procompetitive benefits or reasonable compensation for services, and it does not prevent drug companies from asserting claims under existing antitrust laws. The legislation aims to preserve competition in the pharmaceutical market and potentially reduce drug prices by preventing strategic patent settlements that delay generic drug market entry.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (10)

Last Action

Committee recommended measure be held for further study (on 03/11/2025)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...