Bill

Bill > AB431


WI AB431

WI AB431
Special motions to strike strategic lawsuits against public participation. (FE)


summary

Introduced
09/15/2025
In Committee
09/15/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

2025-2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This bill allows a person to file a special motion to strike in a strategic lawsuit against public participation which, if successful, results in dismissal of the claim subject to the motion. Under the bill, a cause of action brought against a person arising from that person[s acts in furtherance of his or her right of petition or free speech under the U.S. or Wisconsin Constitution in connection with a public issue is subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability of prevailing on the claim. The bill provides that an act in furtherance of a person[s constitutional right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue includes any written or oral statement or writing made 1) before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; 2) in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; or 3) in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest. The bill also provides that any other conduct might also be considered to be an act in furtherance of a person[s constitutional right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue. No special motion to strike may be brought in any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of Wisconsin by the attorney general, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor. In making a determination on a special motion to strike, the court must consider the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based. If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination are admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable is affected by that determination in that case or any subsequent proceeding. Under the bill, except in certain circumstances, a defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike is entitled to recover attorney fees and costs. If, however, the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court must award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff. The bill allows a person to appeal as a matter or right an order granting or denying a special motion to strike. The bill requires that a special motion be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or later if the court permits. The motion must be scheduled for a hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the court[s schedule does not allow for a hearing in that timeframe. Unless the court determines otherwise, when a notice of a special motion is filed, all discovery proceedings in the action are stayed until a ruling is made on the motion. Any party who files a special motion to strike, and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike, must provide the director of state courts with a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice or appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees. Under the bill, the director of state courts must keep a public record of the information for at least three years. For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

AI Summary

This bill creates a legal mechanism called a "special motion to strike" designed to protect individuals from Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP suits), which are legal actions intended to silence or intimidate critics by burdening them with costly legal proceedings. The bill allows a defendant to file a motion to quickly dismiss a lawsuit if the lawsuit arises from the defendant's exercise of free speech or right to petition in connection with a public issue. Under this legislation, the court must evaluate whether the plaintiff is likely to prevail on their claim, considering written statements and affidavits. If the defendant successfully files such a motion, they are typically entitled to recover attorney fees and costs, with exceptions for certain types of enforcement actions. The bill broadly defines acts of free speech to include statements made in legislative, executive, or judicial proceedings, discussions of public issues in open forums, and other conduct related to constitutional rights of petition and free speech. The motion must be filed within 60 days of the complaint's service, and filing the motion automatically stays all discovery proceedings. Additionally, the bill requires that copies of these motions be sent to the director of state courts to maintain a public record, and it mandates that the law should be interpreted in a way that favors protecting constitutional rights of petition and free speech.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (21)

Last Action

Representative J. Jacobson added as a coauthor (on 01/08/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...