Bill

Bill > SB2046


MS SB2046

MS SB2046
Mississippians' Right to Name, Likeness and Voice Act; enact.


summary

Introduced
01/08/2026
In Committee
02/16/2026
Crossed Over
02/11/2026
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

Potential new amendment
2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

An Act To Create New Section 75-101-1, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To Establish A Short Title For The Mississippians' Right To Name, Likeness And Voice Act; To Create New Section 75-101-3, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To Define Terms; To Create New Section 75-101-5, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To Provide That Every Individual Has A Property Right In His Or Her Own Name, Likeness And Voice; To Create New Section 75-101-7, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To Provide Certain Liability For Persons Or Entities Who Infringe On An Individual's Rights Under This Act; To Create New Section 75-101-9, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To Provide A First Amendment Defense To Civil Actions Brought Under This Act; To Create New Section 75-101-11, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To Provide Liability For The Commercial Use Of An Individual's Name, Voice Or Likeness; To Create New Section 75-101-13, Mississippi Code Of 1972, To State The Relationship Of The Act To Other Laws; To Provide That This Act Is Severable; And For Related Purposes.

AI Summary

This bill, known as the Mississippians' Right to Name, Likeness and Voice Act, establishes that every individual in Mississippi has a property right in their own name, likeness (which includes their image or how they are recognized), and voice, and these rights can be transferred, licensed, and inherited for ten years after death. The Act defines key terms such as "commercial use" (using someone's identity for advertising or sales), "digital depiction" (computer-generated images or videos of a person), and "digital voice replica" (computer-generated audio of a person's voice), especially those created using artificial intelligence or other advanced digital technologies. It creates liability for individuals or entities that distribute unauthorized "personalized cloning services" or publish digital voice replicas or depictions without consent, with penalties including significant monetary damages and potential punitive damages and attorney fees. However, the bill includes a First Amendment defense, meaning certain uses related to news, public affairs, historical accounts, commentary, criticism, scholarship, satire, or parody are not considered violations, provided they are not used to create a false impression of the individual's participation or are fleeting. The Act also specifies that commercial use without written consent can lead to injunctions and lawsuits for damages, including treble damages if authorization was not sought in good faith, and clarifies that it does not limit other existing rights and has specific exceptions for telecommunications providers and media outlets publishing advertisements.

Committee Categories

Education, Justice

Sponsors (10)

Last Action

Referred To Judiciary A (on 02/16/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...