Bill

Bill > SB198


VA SB198

VA SB198
Individuals with developmental or intellectual disabilities; admissibility of statements.


summary

Introduced
01/09/2026
In Committee
03/02/2026
Crossed Over
02/13/2026
Passed
Dead
03/14/2026

Introduced Session

Potential new amendment
2026 Regular Regular Session

Bill Summary

Admissibility of statements by individuals with developmental or intellectual disabilities in certain cases. Prohibits admission of any evidence from an individual with developmental disabilities or intellectual disabilities, as defined in relevant law, in certain criminal prosecutions unless the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that such individual's decision to speak to law enforcement was not caused by and did not have a direct and substantial relationship to such individual's disability. The bill requires notice be given to the attorney for the Commonwealth if a defendant intends to introduce expert testimony regarding his disability. The bill prohibits any statements made by a defendant during an examination by an expert witness from being used against him except for impeachment or perjury. The provisions of the bill do not become effective unless reenacted by a subsequent regular or special session of the General Assembly. 

AI Summary

This bill proposes to change the rules regarding the admissibility of statements made by individuals with developmental or intellectual disabilities in certain criminal cases. Specifically, it states that any statement made by a defendant diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, a developmental disability, or an intellectual disability to law enforcement before an attorney is appointed will be inadmissible in court unless the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant's decision to speak was directly influenced by their disability. The bill outlines procedures for defense attorneys to file motions to suppress such statements, including deadlines for filing and holding hearings, and requires disclosure of expert witness information to the prosecution if the defense intends to use expert testimony. It also establishes a presumption that a defendant's decision to speak was influenced by their disability if they score at or below the average for a 14-year-old on a standardized assessment of adaptive functioning that impacts their decision-making. The bill does not apply to charges of capital murder or acts of violence as defined by law, and it allows the Commonwealth to introduce rebuttal evidence.

Committee Categories

Budget and Finance, Justice

Sponsors (1)

Last Action

Tabled in Appropriations (22-Y 0-N) (on 03/09/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...