Bill

Bill > HB3278


OK HB3278

OK HB3278
Open Meeting Act; violations; allowing the Attorney General to enter into a consent order or issue a finding of violation to a public body, agency, or officer; effective date.


summary

Introduced
02/02/2026
In Committee
04/14/2026
Crossed Over
03/11/2026
Passed
04/28/2026
Dead

Introduced Session

2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

An Act relating to the Open Meeting Act; amending 25 O.S. 2021, Section 314, which relates to violations of the Open Meeting Act; allowing the Attorney General to enter into a consent order or issue a finding of violation to a public body, agency, or officer; providing consent order content; providing findings content; allowing the Attorney General to require proof of compliance; permitting application to the district court for enforcement; providing jurisdiction; requiring court order for compliance, civil penalties, costs, and other remedies under certain circumstances; requiring payment of attorney fees for bad-faith violations; providing service procedures; defining term; and providing an effective date. SUBJECT: Open Meeting Act

AI Summary

This bill amends the Open Meeting Act to grant the Attorney General new powers to address violations by public bodies, agencies, or officers, in addition to existing criminal and civil penalties. Specifically, the Attorney General can now investigate alleged violations and, if the evidence supports it, either enter into a "consent order" with the offending entity or issue a "finding of violation." A consent order, which requires the signature of the responsible party, can include requirements like mandatory training on the Open Meeting Act for first-time offenders or civil penalties of up to $150 for subsequent violations, and must state that the entity will comply with the Act. A finding of violation can similarly require the entity to stop violating the Act, comply with its provisions, complete training, and pay civil penalties of up to $300 per violation. The Attorney General can also demand proof of compliance with these orders or findings and, if necessary, seek enforcement in district court, which can then issue its own order for compliance, impose civil penalties, and award court costs and attorney fees to the Attorney General, especially in cases of bad-faith violations. The bill also outlines procedures for serving findings of violation and specifies which district court has jurisdiction for enforcement actions, with a general effective date of January 1, 2027.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (3)

Last Action

Sent to Governor (on 04/28/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...