summary
Introduced
01/21/2026
01/21/2026
In Committee
02/20/2026
02/20/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Deems a county inclusionary mandate as a form of development exaction and treats the mandate as a housing affordability impact fee, with certain exemptions. Prohibits a county from adopting, amending, or enforcing an inclusionary mandate or inclusionary mandates for residential or mixed-use development, under certain circumstances. Establishes additional requirements for a needs assessment study for a county-imposed inclusionary mandate. Establishes a criterion that allows luxury residential projects or projects that receive certain discretionary value increases to be subject to inclusionary mandates. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
AI Summary
This bill, effective July 1, 3000, reclassifies county inclusionary mandates, which require developers to include a certain percentage of affordable housing in their projects, as a form of "development exaction" and treats them as "housing affordability impact fees." It prohibits counties from enforcing these mandates under certain conditions, particularly for non-luxury residential or mixed-use developments that don't receive special zoning increases, unless the county can prove the mandate is constitutionally sound (essential nexus and rough proportionality) and won't increase market-rate housing prices or suppress production, or if the county provides offsetting incentives. For luxury projects or those receiving discretionary zoning increases, inclusionary mandates are allowed only if a needs assessment study demonstrates their necessity and proportionality, and the mandate doesn't exceed specific cost limits. The bill also establishes stricter requirements for these needs assessment studies, demanding detailed data, analysis of various housing types, and feasibility assessments with and without the mandate, while exempting certain types of construction like resort or vacation rentals and projects by state housing authorities.
Committee Categories
Agriculture and Natural Resources, Housing and Urban Affairs, Justice
Sponsors (11)
Terez Amato (D)*,
Luke Evslin (D)*,
Greggor Ilagan (D)*,
Kirstin Kahaloa (D)*,
Darius Kila (D)*,
Lauren Matsumoto (R)*,
Tyson Miyake (D)*,
Dee Morikawa (D)*,
Julie Reyes Oda (R)*,
Kanani Souza (R)*,
David Tarnas (D)*,
Last Action
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Hashem, Kahaloa, Sayama, Takayama, Garcia; Ayes with reservations: none; 1 Noes: Representative(s) Shimizu; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Belatti, Cochran. (on 02/26/2026)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1741&year=2026 |
| HB1741_HD1_TESTIMONY_JHA_02-26-26_ | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/Testimony/HB1741_HD1_TESTIMONY_JHA_02-26-26_.PDF |
| Committee Report HB1741_HD1_HSCR718-26_ | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/CommReports/HB1741_HD1_HSCR718-26_.pdf |
| HB1741_HD1_TESTIMONY_WAL_02-19-26_ | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/Testimony/HB1741_HD1_TESTIMONY_WAL_02-19-26_.PDF |
| BillText | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/bills/HB1741_HD1_.HTM |
| Committee Report HB1741_HD1_HSCR112-26_ | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/CommReports/HB1741_HD1_HSCR112-26_.pdf |
| HB1741_TESTIMONY_HSG_02-04-26_ | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/Testimony/HB1741_TESTIMONY_HSG_02-04-26_.PDF |
| BillText | https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/bills/HB1741_.HTM |
Loading...