Bill > AR37

Introduced Session

This resolution urges institutions of higher education in the State to protect freedom of expression and open debate on campus in order to provide students with a high-quality education and prepare them for life in a democratic society. Institutions of higher education are positioned to both foster and stifle opportunities for dialogue on a range of controversial social and political topics, and instances of free expression being restricted in these settings has created a culture of censorship that is detrimental to the well-being of our nation. The ability to speak freely is a critical means by which our nation can maintain and nourish its system of democratic government. The freedom of speech, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, was seen by our Founding Fathers as essential to healthy political life because it fosters discourse and understanding between competing factions. Numerous researchers and commentators have noted that political polarization in the United States has been growing steadily since the early 1990s and further accelerated by factors such as the rise of the Internet, the 24-hour news cycle and the self-selection of partisan news sources. This has led to increased hostility towards those holding different views, decreased willingness to collaborate and compromise, and a desire to censor the views of those with whom a person disagrees. Nowhere has this trend become more visible than on the campuses of institutions of higher education where guest speakers, students, faculty, and administrators find themselves subject to harassment, ridicule, exclusion, and even punishment, if they express views contrary to those of the larger or more vocal parts of the campus community. An example of this was seen in New Jersey when former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice declined an invitation to speak at the 2014 Rutgers University commencement ceremony after a faculty council resolution and student protests demanded that the University rescind her invitation based on her role in the Iraq War. Restricting free expression has now changed the behavior of students with many now reporting that they engage in self-censorship when not in the company of like-minded peers or instructors out of fear of the social consequences. By encouraging robust debate and open dialogue, students have the freedom to test their own ideas while learning the value of empathy and tolerance for a diverse and balanced spectrum of opinions.

AI Summary

Committee Categories

Gerry Scharfenberger (R)*, 

Introduced, Referred to Assembly Higher Education Committee (on 01/13/2026)

Official Document