Bill
Bill > HB650
summary
Introduced
01/30/2026
01/30/2026
In Committee
01/30/2026
01/30/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Repealing a certain provision relating to strategic lawsuits against public participation; authorizing a person served with a pleading asserting a certain cause of action based on the person's communication related to a governmental proceeding or exercise of certain constitutional rights to file a special motion for expedited relief to dismiss the cause of action; and generally relating to civil actions and public expression.
AI Summary
This bill, titled the Maryland Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, establishes a process for individuals or entities facing civil lawsuits based on their public speech or participation in governmental proceedings to seek expedited dismissal. It repeals an existing provision related to "SLAPP suits" (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), which were lawsuits intended to silence critics through costly legal battles. Under this new act, if a person is sued for communications related to a governmental proceeding or for exercising constitutional rights like freedom of speech or petition on matters of public concern, they can file a special motion to dismiss the case quickly. This motion triggers a stay, or pause, on all other legal proceedings, including discovery (the process of gathering evidence), until the motion is resolved, unless specific exceptions apply, such as the need for limited discovery to determine if the case should proceed or to address imminent threats to public health or safety. The court must hear the motion within 60 days and will dismiss the case if the person being sued can show the act applies, the other party fails to show it doesn't apply, and either the plaintiff hasn't presented a basic case or the defendant has shown the case lacks merit or is based on undisputed facts. If the motion to dismiss is successful, the defendant can recover court costs, attorney fees, and litigation expenses, and the act is intended to be broadly interpreted to protect free speech rights.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (7)
Sandy Rosenberg (D)*,
Jon Cardin (D),
Elizabeth Embry (D),
Scott Phillips (D),
Stuart Schmidt (R),
Sean Stinnett (D),
Nicole Williams (D),
Last Action
House Judiciary Hearing (13:00:00 2/25/2026 ) (on 02/25/2026)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/HB0650?ys=2026RS |
| BillText | https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2026RS/bills/hb/hb0650f.pdf |
Loading...