Bill

Bill > SB444


GA SB444

GA SB444
Private Review Agents; certain decisions with regard to the provision of insurance coverage for healthcare services shall not be based solely on artificial intelligence systems; provide


summary

Introduced
02/02/2026
In Committee
03/18/2026
Crossed Over
02/11/2026
Passed
05/05/2026
Dead
Signed/Enacted/Adopted
05/05/2026

Introduced Session

2025-2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

AN ACT To amend Chapter 46 of Title 33 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to certification of private review agents, so as to provide that certain decisions with regard to the provision of insurance coverage for healthcare services shall not be based solely on artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence, or other software tools; to provide for definitions; to provide for related matters; to provide for an effective date; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.

AI Summary

This bill, effective January 1, 2027, amends Georgia law concerning private review agents, which are entities that review healthcare services to determine if they are medically necessary and appropriate for insurance coverage. The key provision is that while private review agents and utilization review entities can use artificial intelligence (AI) systems, AI, or other software tools to assist in their processes, these tools cannot be the sole basis for making decisions about insurance coverage for healthcare services. The bill defines "artificial intelligence" as a machine-based system that makes predictions, recommendations, or decisions based on human-defined objectives, and "artificial intelligence system" as a system that emulates human cognitive processes like learning and reasoning. Importantly, these AI tools can automate tasks and aid in decision-making, but they are prohibited from issuing a final denial of coverage (an adverse determination) to a patient unless a human reviewer, who is a qualified private review agent or utilization review entity and includes a participating clinical peer, has conducted a review. Furthermore, the judgment of this clinical peer must always take precedence over any AI system's recommendation.

Committee Categories

Business and Industry, Transportation and Infrastructure

Sponsors (6)

Last Action

Act 411 (on 05/05/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...