Bill

Bill > SB112


CO SB112

CO SB112
Court Actions Related to Failure to Appear in Court


summary

Introduced
02/11/2026
In Committee
02/11/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

Under current law, a court is required to release a person on a personal recognizance bond if the person was charged with an offense for a violation with a maximum penalty that does not exceed 6 months' imprisonment and the court cannot require the person to give security of any kind for their appearance for trial other than their personal recognizance, unless certain conditions exist. The bill clarifies that these provisions apply in both state and municipal courts. The bill adds to the conditions for which a person may be required to give security that the defendant previously failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case. Existing law prohibits a court from imposing a monetary condition of release for a defendant charged with a traffic offense, petty offense, or comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense for which there is no comparable state misdemeanor offense, with specified exceptions. The bill adds exceptions for: ! A petty offense for theft, criminal mischief, or arson, or a comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense involving threats of violence, injury, or property damage, if the defendant has previously failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case; and ! Any other petty offense, traffic offense, or a comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense for which there is no comparable state offense, if the defendant has previously failed to appear for a court proceeding 2 or more times in the present case and has another pending charge for the same offense in the same jurisdiction. The bill states that if a defendant's counsel is present at a court proceeding as required by a court and the defendant is not present, with the exceptions of trial, arraignment, contested hearings, and hearings in which a witness or victim is testifying before the court, the defendant's absence may not be considered a failure to appear. The bill applies the exceptions involving previous instances of a defendant's failure to appear for a municipal court proceeding only when, prior to issuing a warrant for the arrest of the defendant for the previous failure to appear, the court conducted a search to determine whether the defendant was being held in a correctional facility or county jail, and at the time of the previous failure to appear, the court had certain processes in place governing failures to appear. The bill requires municipal courts to not consider a person's absence from a place and time specified in a summons or summons and complaint as a failure to appear if the person's counsel is present on their behalf.

AI Summary

This bill modifies existing laws regarding court appearances and failures to appear, clarifying that current provisions for releasing individuals on their personal recognizance bond for minor offenses (those with a maximum penalty of six months imprisonment or less) apply to both state and municipal courts. It expands the conditions under which a judge can require a security bond, specifically allowing it if a defendant has failed to appear in court two or more times in the current case. The bill also revises rules about imposing monetary conditions for release, generally prohibiting them for traffic or petty offenses, but creating exceptions if a defendant has a history of two or more failures to appear in the current case, particularly for theft, criminal mischief, or arson, or if they have another pending charge for the same offense in the same jurisdiction. Furthermore, it clarifies that a defendant's absence from a court proceeding is not considered a failure to appear if their attorney is present, unless it's a trial, arraignment, contested hearing, or a hearing where a witness or victim is testifying. For municipal courts, specific procedures must be followed before a previous failure to appear can be used to justify requiring a security bond, including searching for the defendant in jail and having established processes for continuances and excusing failures to appear. Finally, it states that a defendant's absence from a summons or summons and complaint is not a failure to appear if their counsel is present.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (2)

Last Action

Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary (on 02/11/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...