Bill
Bill > A4208
NJ A4208
NJ A4208Provides right of action for individuals alleging denial of professional credential by State is result of policy or process causing disparate impact on basis of race or ethnicity.
summary
Introduced
02/19/2026
02/19/2026
In Committee
02/19/2026
02/19/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2026-2027 Regular Session
Bill Summary
This bill creates a private right of action for an individual who was denied a professional license, certification, registration or other authorization by an entity created under Title 45 or Title 52 of the Revised Statutes, or by a principal department of the Executive Branch of State government, an entity within a department or any entity created to license or otherwise regulate a profession and who claims the denial is the result of a policy or process promulgated or otherwise effectuated by the State entity that causes a disparate impact on the issuance of a license, certification, registration or other authorization on the basis of race or ethnicity. Under the bill, the individual has a right to file a verified complaint in writing with the Division of Civil Rights in the New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety or the New Jersey Superior Court. An individual must follow the provisions of the law against discrimination in order to bring an action pursuant to the bill. Additionally, under the bill, the individual filing a complaint has the burden of demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, that an application for licensure was denied by a licensing entity as a result of a policy or process that causes a disparate racial impact. The Division on Civil Rights or New Jersey Superior Court is to consider if the individual demonstrates that a disparate impact is caused by: (1) a policy or process that has a disproportionate impact on individuals of a certain race or ethnicity; (2) a policy or process that is applied inconsistently or unreasonably by a licensing entity; or (3) factors considered by a licensing entity that are unrelated to the profession in which the individual seeks a license. In the bill, it is considered a defense for a licensing entity if the rationale for a policy or process justifies the policy or process having an identifiable disparate impact on the basis of race or ethnicity. The rationale can be justified if the licensing entity demonstrates that: (1) the disparate impact is based on one or more legitimate, bona fide factors, such as training, education, experience, or examination, or the quality of services provided; (2) the factor or factors are not based on, and do not perpetuate, a disparate impact based on race or ethnicity; (3) each of the factors is applied reasonably; (4) one or more of the factors account for the entire disparate impact; and (5) the factors are related to the license being sought. The bill provides that a factor shall not apply if it is demonstrated that there are alternative policies or processes that would serve the same purpose without producing the disparate impact.
AI Summary
This bill establishes a new legal avenue for individuals who believe they have been unfairly denied a professional license, certification, or other authorization by a New Jersey state entity, including those created under Titles 45 or 52 of the Revised Statutes, principal departments of the Executive Branch, or entities that regulate professions. Specifically, it grants these individuals the right to sue if they can demonstrate that the denial resulted from a state policy or process that disproportionately affects people based on their race or ethnicity, a concept known as "disparate impact." To pursue this claim, individuals must file a verified complaint with either the Division of Civil Rights or the New Jersey Superior Court, following the procedures outlined in the state's Law Against Discrimination. The burden of proof lies with the individual filing the complaint, who must show by a "preponderance of the evidence" (meaning it's more likely than not) that a policy or process caused a disparate racial or ethnic impact, either by disproportionately affecting certain racial or ethnic groups, being applied inconsistently, or considering factors unrelated to the profession. State entities can defend themselves by proving that any disparate impact stems from legitimate, non-discriminatory factors like training, education, or experience, provided these factors are applied reasonably, account for the entire impact, and are relevant to the license sought, and that no alternative policies exist that would achieve the same purpose without the disparate impact.
Committee Categories
Business and Industry
Sponsors (1)
Last Action
Introduced, Referred to Assembly Regulated Professions Committee (on 02/19/2026)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2026/A4208 |
| BillText | https://pub.njleg.gov/Bills/2026/A4500/4208_I1.HTM |
Loading...