summary
Introduced
02/17/2026
02/17/2026
In Committee
02/17/2026
02/17/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
126th General Assembly
Bill Summary
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Adding Section 15-32-710 So As To Define Terms Related To Calculating Medical Expenses For Damage Awards; By Adding Section 15-32-720 So As To Provide That The Plaintiff Has The Burden To Prove Amount Of His Damages Arising From Healthcare Treatment Or Services; To Provide For The Evidence Allowed To Prove The Amount Of Damages; To Provide For Certain Required Disclosures By The Plaintiff, And To Provide That It Is The Intent Of The General Assembly That This Section Abrogates The Common Law Collateral Source Rule To The Extent Necessary To Introduce The Evidence Described In This Act.
AI Summary
This bill, titled "Calculating Medical Expenses for Damage Awards," aims to change how medical expenses are calculated in civil lawsuits in South Carolina. It defines terms like "health insurance" (which includes various third-party payers and government programs), "health care provider" (licensed medical professionals and entities), and "letter of protection" (an agreement where a healthcare provider is paid from a lawsuit's outcome). The bill places the burden on the plaintiff, the person suing, to prove the actual amount of their damages related to healthcare treatment or services, limiting these damages to the reasonable value of medically necessary care. To prove these damages, plaintiffs must present evidence of the amounts charged or expected to be charged, and importantly, if they have health insurance, they must show the amounts actually paid or covered by that insurance, even if it hasn't been used yet. If the plaintiff lacks insurance, the bill sets specific limits on what can be claimed, based on agreed-upon amounts, Medicare rates, or Medicaid rates. For cases involving a "letter of protection," plaintiffs must disclose the agreement, all itemized billings, details if the debt was sold to a third party, whether they had insurance at the time, and who referred them for treatment, with referrals by attorneys being explicitly disclosable and relevant to potential bias. A key provision states that this bill intends to override the common law "collateral source rule," which generally prevents defendants from introducing evidence that a plaintiff's losses were covered by other sources like insurance, to the extent necessary to introduce the evidence described in this act, though courts can still provide instructions to prevent jury confusion.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (13)
Shane Massey (R)*,
Sean Bennett (R),
Allen Blackmon (R),
Wes Climer (R),
Ronnie Cromer (R),
Tom Davis (R),
Mike Gambrell (R),
Larry Grooms (R),
Russell Ott (D),
Ross Turner (R),
Danny Verdin (R),
Kent Williams (D),
Jeffrey Zell (R),
Last Action
Scrivener's error corrected (on 02/18/2026)
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://www.scstatehouse.gov/billsearch.php?billnumbers=0930&session=126&summary=B |
| BillText | https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/prever/930_20260218.htm |
| BillText | https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess126_2025-2026/prever/930_20260217.htm |
Loading...