Bill

Bill > HB5579


MI HB5579

MI HB5579
Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.


summary

Introduced
02/24/2026
In Committee
02/24/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

103rd Legislature

Bill Summary

A bill to prescribe the circumstances under which an employer, third party, or service provider may use an automated decisions tool or electronic monitoring tool; to require the retention of certain data and documents; to require an impact assessment of electronic monitoring tools and automated decisions tools; to require an employer to provide covered individuals and certain labor organizations notice of certain events; to require an employer to provide certain benefits to certain individuals under certain circumstances; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state governmental officers and entities; to provide remedies; to prescribe civil sanctions; and to require the promulgation of rules.

AI Summary

This bill, titled the "Responsible Artificial Intelligence Security for Employees Act," aims to regulate the use of electronic monitoring and automated decision tools by employers in Michigan. It defines "automated decisions tool" as any computational process, including AI, that assists or replaces human judgment in making employment decisions, and "electronic monitoring tool" as any system that collects data on employee activities or communications without direct observation. The bill generally prohibits employers from using these tools to make employment-related decisions, with exceptions for screening large volumes of job applications to identify candidates meeting specific criteria or assessing job skills. However, employers can use electronic monitoring for purposes like facilitating job functions, monitoring production, assessing performance, ensuring legal compliance, or protecting employee safety, but only after providing written notice and obtaining written consent from affected employees. Crucially, employers must conduct an "impact assessment" before implementing these tools, evaluating potential biases, discriminatory outcomes, and privacy concerns, and this assessment must be made public and shared with employees. The bill also mandates data retention limits, prohibits selling or licensing employee data, and outlines strict procedures and significant benefits for employees in case of a data security breach. Furthermore, it requires employers to provide advance notice of tool implementation, allow employees to opt out of monitoring without penalty, and engage in collective bargaining with labor organizations regarding the use of these technologies. Violations can result in civil fines and legal action.

Committee Categories

Government Affairs

Sponsors (48)

Penelope Tsernoglou (D)* Joey Andrews (D),  Noah Arbit (D),  Kelly Breen (D),  Julie Brixie (D),  Erin Byrnes (D),  Brenda Carter (D),  Tyrone Carter (D),  Betsy Coffia (D),  Jennifer Conlin (D),  Emily Dievendorf (D),  Kimberly Edwards (D),  Alabas Farhat (D),  John Fitzgerald (D),  Morgan Foreman (D),  Kristian Grant (D),  Peter Herzberg (D),  Kara Hope (D),  Jason Hoskins (D),  Matt Koleszar (D),  Tullio Liberati (D),  Matt Longjohn (D),  Sharon MacDonell (D),  Jaz Martus (D),  Mike McFall (D),  Donavan McKinney (D),  Denise Mentzer (D),  Reggie Miller (D),  Jason Morgan (D),  Tonya Myers Phillips (D),  Cynthia Neeley (D),  Amos O'Neal (D),  Veronica Paiz (D),  Laurie Pohutsky (D),  Natalie Price (D),  Carrie Rheingans (D),  Julie Rogers (D),  Helena Scott (D),  Phil Skaggs (D),  Will Snyder (D),  Samantha Steckloff (D),  Joseph Tate (D),  Dylan Wegela (D),  Regina Weiss (D),  Jimmie Wilson (D),  Stephen Wooden (D),  Mai Xiong (D),  Stephanie Young (D), 

Last Action

Bill Electronically Reproduced 02/24/2026 (on 02/26/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...