Bill

Bill > S714


US S714

US S714
Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2013


summary

Introduced
04/11/2013
In Committee
04/11/2013
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
01/03/2015

Introduced Session

113th Congress

Bill Summary

Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2013 - Defines a "covered civil action" as a civil action seeking to compel agency action and alleging that an agency is unlawfully withholding or unreasonably delaying an agency action relating to a regulatory action that would affect: (1) the rights of private persons other than the person bringing the action; or (2) a state, local, or tribal government. Defines a "covered consent decree" or a "covered settlement agreement" as: (1) a consent decree or settlement agreement entered into a covered civil action, and (2) any other consent decree or settlement agreement that requires agency action relating to such a regulatory action that affects the rights of such persons or governments. Requires an agency against which a covered civil action is brought to publish the notice of intent to sue and the complaint in a readily accessible manner, including by making such notice and complaint available online not later than 15 days after receiving service of such notice or complaint Requires an agency seeking to enter a covered consent decree or settlement agreement to publish such decree or agreement in the Federal Register and online not later than 60 days before it is filed with the court. Provides for public comment and public hearings on such decree or agreement. Requires the Attorney General or an agency head, if an agency is litigating a matter independently, to certify to the court that the Attorney General or the agency head approves of: (1) any proposed covered consent decree that includes terms that convert into a nondiscretionary duty a discretionary authority of an agency to propose, promulgate, revise, or amend regulations, commit an agency to expend funds that have not been appropriated and budgeted or to seek a particular appropriation or budget authorization, divest an agency of discretion committed to it by statute or the Constitution, or otherwise afford any relief that the court could not enter under its own authority; or (2) any proposed covered settlement agreement that includes terms that provide a remedy for a failure by the agency to comply with the terms of the agreement other than the revival of the civil action resolved by the agreement, interfere with the authority of an agency to revise, amend, or issue rules, or commit the agency to expend funds that have not been appropriated and budgeted or to exercise in a particular way discretion which was committed to the agency by statute or the Constitution. Requires a court to grant de novo review of a covered consent decree or settlement agreement if an agency files a motion to modify such decree or agreement on the basis that its terms are no longer fully in the public interest due to the agency's obligations to fulfill other duties or due to changed facts and circumstances.

AI Summary

This bill, the Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2013, aims to increase transparency and public input in legal agreements between government agencies and private parties that involve regulatory actions. It defines a "covered civil action" as a lawsuit seeking to force an agency to take action or alleging an agency is improperly delaying a regulatory action that affects the rights of private individuals or governments. Similarly, a "covered consent decree" or "covered settlement agreement" refers to such agreements arising from these lawsuits, or any other agreement requiring agency action on regulatory matters impacting private parties or governments. The bill mandates that agencies must publicly post notices of intent to sue and complaints within 15 days of receiving them, and any proposed consent decree or settlement agreement must be published in the Federal Register and online at least 60 days before being filed with a court, allowing for public comment and potentially public hearings. Furthermore, if an agreement involves terms that would convert an agency's discretionary authority into a mandatory duty, commit the agency to spending unappropriated funds, or divest it of statutory or constitutional discretion, the Attorney General or agency head must personally certify their approval to the court. Finally, if an agency later seeks to modify such an agreement due to changed circumstances, courts will conduct a fresh review of the agreement.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (11)

Last Action

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (on 04/11/2013)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...