summary
Introduced
03/26/2015
03/26/2015
In Committee
08/13/2015
08/13/2015
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
01/03/2017
01/03/2017
Introduced Session
114th Congress
Bill Summary
Design-Build Efficiency and Jobs Act of 2015 Modifies criteria for the use of design-build selection procedures for civilian and defense contracts for the design and construction of a public building, facility, or work. Requires the use of two-phase selection procedures (i.e., submission of qualifications and then the submission of price and technical proposals in response to a request for proposal) when a contracting officer determines that such a contract has a value of $750,000 or greater. Maintains current criteria for these contracts if a contracting officer determines that they have a value of less than $750,000. Requires the contracting officer to provide written documentation of how more than five finalists in a solicitation for a contract is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures. Requires: (1) executive agencies to report on contracts for which more than five finalists were selected for phase-two requests or for which the contract was awarded without using two-phase selection procedures, and (2) the Government Accountability Office to report on the compliance of such agencies with design-build contract procedures.
AI Summary
This bill, the Design-Build Efficiency and Jobs Act of 2015, modifies how the government awards contracts for designing and building public facilities. For contracts valued at $750,000 or more, it mandates the use of a "two-phase selection procedure," which involves first evaluating a company's qualifications and then, for a select group, requesting detailed technical and price proposals. For contracts under $750,000, this two-phase process is still encouraged if certain conditions are met, such as anticipating multiple offers, requiring design work before pricing, and significant proposal preparation costs. The bill also clarifies that if more than five companies are chosen as finalists for the second phase of a contract, the contracting officer must provide written justification explaining why this is in the government's best interest. Furthermore, executive agencies will be required to report annually on instances where more than five finalists were selected or where the two-phase process wasn't used, and these reports will be made public. Finally, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) will review these agency reports to ensure compliance with the new design-build contract procedures.
Committee Categories
Government Affairs, Military Affairs and Security
Sponsors (23)
Sam Graves (R)*,
Mo Brooks (R),
Matt Cartwright (D),
Mike Coffman (R),
Scott DesJarlais (R),
Tammy Duckworth (D),
Blake Farenthold (R),
Glenn Grothman (R),
Richard Hanna (R),
Gregg Harper (R),
Jaime Herrera Beutler (R),
Mick Mulvaney (R),
Steven Palazzo (R),
Erik Paulsen (R),
Collin Peterson (D),
Dennis Ross (R),
Kurt Schrader (D),
Patrick Tiberi (R),
Scott Tipton (R),
Marc Veasey (D),
Daniel Webster (R),
Peter Welch (D),
Ted Yoho (R),
Last Action
Referred to the Subcommittee on Readiness. (on 08/13/2015)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...