Bill

Bill > S2679


NJ S2679

NJ S2679
Establishes four-year pilot program in Ocean County for electronic monitoring of certain domestic violence offenders; designated as "Lisa's Law"; appropriates $2.5 million.


summary

Introduced
10/13/2016
In Committee
10/13/2016
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
01/08/2018

Introduced Session

2016-2017 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This bill would establish a four-year pilot program in Ocean County for electronic monitoring of certain domestic violence offenders and notification to victims. The pilot program would be designated as "Lisa's Law" in remembrance of Letizia Zindell of Toms River, a domestic violence victim murdered by her former fiancée. The pilot program would apply to defendants convicted of contempt of a domestic violence order entered pursuant to the provisions of P.L.1981, c.426 (C.2C:25-1 et al.) or P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-17 et al.). Under the pilot program, when a defendant is convicted of contempt of a domestic violence order the court may, in addition to or in lieu of any other disposition: (1) sentence the defendant to electronic monitoring with victim notification; or (2) sentence the defendant to probation or a suspension of sentence and, as a condition of such probation or suspension, order electronic monitoring with victim notification. In making the determination whether to place the defendant on electronic monitoring, the court may hold a hearing to consider the likelihood that the defendant's participation in electronic monitoring would deter the defendant from injuring the victim. The court would consider, among other factors, the seriousness of harm that the defendant inflicted on the victim; the defendant's previous history of domestic violence and other criminal acts, if any; whether the defendant has access to a weapon; and whether the defendant has threatened suicide or homicide or has a history of mental illness or substance abuse. Under the bill, a defendant ordered by the court to be placed on electronic monitoring could be ordered to pay the costs and expenses related to electronic monitoring and victim notification or a portion of the costs and expenses, based on the defendant's ability to pay. In addition, the defendant would be assessed a monitoring fee of $250. The court could waive the fee in cases of extreme financial hardship. It would be a crime of the third degree to tamper with, remove, or vandalize an electronic monitoring device. A crime of the third degree is punishable by a term of imprisonment of three to five years or a fine of up to $15,000 or both. Under the bill, electronic monitoring could be ordered only with the victim's informed consent, which would include: being provided with information concerning the victim's right to refuse to participate in electronic monitoring and the process for requesting the court to terminate the victim's participation after it has been ordered; the operational procedures of the monitoring device and applicable instructions for same; the manner in which the electronic monitoring technology functions and the risks and limitations of that technology, and the extent to which the system will track and record the victim's location and movements; the boundaries imposed on the defendant during the electronic monitoring; the sanctions that the court may impose on the defendant for violating a court order; the procedure that the victim is to follow if the defendant violates an order or if the electronic monitoring equipment fails; identification of support services available to assist the victim in developing a safety plan; identification of community services available to assist the victim in obtaining shelter, counseling, child care, legal representation and other assistance; and the non-confidential nature of the victim's communications with the court concerning electronic monitoring and the restrictions to be imposed upon the defendant's movements. The bill also provides that, from the implementation of the pilot program through the fifth year thereafter, any person found by the court in a final domestic violence hearing to have committed an act of domestic violence would be required to pay a civil penalty of $200. Like the monitoring fee, the court could waive this penalty in cases of extreme financial hardship. In addition, the court would impose a civil penalty of $250 on any person convicted of a crime or offense involving domestic violence, or convicted of contempt of a domestic violence order, unless the person was previously assessed the above-described $250 monitoring fee after being placed under electronic monitoring. The civil penalties would expire at the end of the fifth year following implementation of the pilot program. The bill establishes a "Domestic Violence Victim Notification Fund," a dedicated, non-lapsing fund within the General Fund and administered by the Attorney General. This fund would be the depository of the costs and expenses imposed on the defendant for electronic monitoring and victim notification, the monitoring fee, civil penalties, and any other monies that may be available to the fund through appropriation by the Legislature or any public or private source. All moneys deposited in the "Domestic Violence Victim Notification Fund" would be used to defray the costs of electronic monitoring with victim notification pursuant to the pilot program. The bill appropriates $2.5 million from the General Fund to the "Domestic Violence Victim Notification Fund." Following the expiration of the four-year pilot program, any unexpended funds would be returned to the General Fund. The bill requires the Attorney General, in consultation with the Administrative Office of the Courts, to develop procedures to determine, investigate, and report on a 24-hour-per-day basis a defendant's noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the electronic monitoring program. All reports of noncompliance would be investigated by a law enforcement officer within a reasonable period of time. The bill would also amend the "Local Public Contracts Law," P.L.1971, c.198 (C.40A:11-1 et seq.), to provide that services and equipment necessary for the implementation of the pilot program could be negotiated and awarded by a governing body without public advertising for bids and bidding, and be awarded by resolution of the governing body. The bill further provides that no supplier of a product, system, or service used for electronic monitoring with victim notification in the pilot program would be liable, directly or indirectly, for damages arising from any injury or death associated with the use of the product, system or service unless, and only to the extent that, such action is based on a claim that the injury or death was proximately caused by a manufacturing defect in the product or system. In addition, the bill provides that not later than one year following the implementation of the pilot program and annually thereafter for four years, the Attorney General would submit a report to the Governor and Legislature containing an evaluation of the pilot program with a recommendation as to whether it should be continued as a Statewide program.

AI Summary

This bill establishes a four-year pilot program in Ocean County for electronic monitoring of certain domestic violence offenders and notification to victims. The pilot program, designated as "Lisa's Law," would apply to defendants convicted of contempt of a domestic violence order. The court may order electronic monitoring with victim notification or sentence the defendant to probation or suspension with electronic monitoring as a condition. The bill creates a "Domestic Violence Victim Notification Fund" to defray the costs of the program, funded by fees and penalties imposed on defendants. The bill also provides liability protections for suppliers of the electronic monitoring system and allows the pilot program to bypass certain public contracting requirements. The Attorney General must report annually on the effectiveness of the pilot program, which will expire after four years.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (7)

Last Action

Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee (on 10/13/2016)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...