Bill
Bill > S3398
summary
Introduced
06/29/2017
06/29/2017
In Committee
06/29/2017
06/29/2017
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
01/08/2018
01/08/2018
Introduced Session
2016-2017 Regular Session
Bill Summary
This bill prohibits the imposition of a builder's remedy in exclusionary zoning litigation. The builder's remedy, as a method of achieving fair share housing, has been contrary to the public interest and public policy goals in that it resulted in the development of extraordinary amounts of market rate housing in densely populated regions while producing comparatively little affordable housing, to the overall detriment of specific communities and the State as a whole. Municipalities have attempted to navigate the rulings of the court for nearly four decades, but have been unable to adequately address the affordable housing needs of the State despite the threat of builder's remedy lawsuits. Under the bill, if a court determines that a municipality has failed to meet its obligation to provide a reasonable opportunity for the development of affordable housing, a court may impose a remedy other than a builder's remedy. For the purposes of the bill, "builder's remedy" means a court imposed remedy for a litigant who is an individual or a profit-making entity in which the court requires a municipality to utilize zoning techniques such as mandatory set-asides or density bonuses which provide for the economic viability of a residential development by including housing which is not for low and moderate income households.
AI Summary
This bill prohibits the imposition of a "builder's remedy" in exclusionary zoning litigation. The builder's remedy is a court-imposed remedy where a municipality is required to use zoning techniques like mandatory set-asides or density bonuses to make a residential development economically viable, but the resulting housing is not for low and moderate-income households. The bill declares that the builder's remedy has been contrary to the public interest, as it has led to the development of large amounts of market-rate housing in densely populated regions while producing little affordable housing. Instead, the bill states that the state's preference is for a mediation and review process, rather than litigation, to resolve disputes over exclusionary zoning. If a court determines a municipality has failed to meet its affordable housing obligations, the court may impose a remedy other than a builder's remedy.
Committee Categories
Housing and Urban Affairs
Sponsors (2)
Last Action
Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee (on 06/29/2017)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bills/BillView.asp?BillNumber=S3398 |
| BillText | https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2016/Bills/S3500/3398_I1.HTM |
| Bill | https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2016/Bills/S3500/3398_I1.PDF |
Loading...