Bill

Bill > AB502


WI AB502

WI AB502
Outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances and that are affected by certain transportation-related projects; compensation for takings of signs, and appraisals upon which jurisdictional offers are based. (FE)


summary

Introduced
10/09/2025
In Committee
01/16/2026
Crossed Over
01/15/2026
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

2025-2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This bill revises the standards governing the treatment of outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances (nonconforming signs) and that are affected by certain transportation-related public projects, prohibits the use of the Xunit ruleY in the condemnation of signs, and limits the use of certain appraisals as the basis for a jurisdictional offer. Under current law, if a highway project of the Department of Transportation causes the realignment of a nonconforming sign, the realignment does not affect the sign[s nonconforming status under the ordinance. XRealignmentY is defined as relocation on the same site. Also under current law, if DOT proposes the realignment of a sign in connection with a highway project, DOT must notify the municipality or county that adopted the ordinance to which the nonconforming sign does not conform of the sign[s proposed realignment. The municipality or county may then petition DOT to condemn the sign instead of realigning the sign, but must pay DOT for certain costs of condemnation if DOT succeeds in condemning the sign. This bill expands the types of projects covered and replaces the realignment provision with a repositioning provision. Under this bill, if a state or local transportation project for which DOT has allocated state or federal funds (covered project) causes the removal or reduces the visibility of a nonconforming sign, the sign[s nonconforming status under the ordinance is not affected if the sign is repositioned within the political subdivision in a manner approved by the political subdivision. Repositioning under the bill means raising, lowering, rotating, or adjusting the sign or moving the sign to another location. In general, the bill requires that the characteristics of a nonconforming sign be the same after repositioning as before repositioning. If a sign is repositioned, the agency undertaking the covered project must pay to the sign owner the actual replacement costs incurred by the sign owner in repositioning the sign. The bill requires that replacement costs be determined by using the moving cost agreement for the relocation of outdoor advertising signs. Also under this bill, the agency that undertakes a covered project proposes the repositioning a nonconforming sign in connection with the project, that agency must notify the municipality or county that adopted the ordinance to which the sign does not conform of the sign[s proposed repositioning. The municipality or county may then petition the agency to condemn the sign instead of repositioning, but must pay the agency for certain costs of condemnation if the agency succeeds in condemning the sign. This bill also prohibits the use of the Xunit ruleY in the condemnation of signs. In general, for properties owned by multiple parties, the Xunit ruleY limits the liability of a condemnor to the fair market value of the property taken, notwithstanding the potential loss in property value to the separate parties. This bill provides that, for signs, a condemnor must pay values for 1) the value of the sign and any lease related to the sign, 2) the loss in value to other signs of the owner caused by the removal of the sign, and 3) with regard to the owner of the real property on which the sign is located, the loss of the right to erect and maintain the sign. The bill specifically provides that these amounts are not limited to the fair market value of the property as an undivided whole. This bill also prohibits a condemnor from using as an appraisal upon which a jurisdictional offer is based any appraisal in which the amount of the owner[s appraised loss is less than 85 percent or more than 115 percent of the amount of the owner[s loss provided in the jurisdictional offer. For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

AI Summary

This bill revises the legal framework for outdoor advertising signs that do not conform to local ordinances and are affected by transportation-related projects. The bill introduces a new concept of "repositioning" signs, which allows sign owners to move, raise, lower, rotate, or adjust their signs when they are impacted by state or local transportation projects that receive state or federal funding. Under this legislation, if a sign is repositioned, its non-conforming status with local ordinances will not be affected, provided the repositioning is approved by the local political subdivision. The bill mandates that repositioned signs maintain their original characteristics, such as sign face size and number of faces, with some flexibility for height adjustments necessary to maintain visibility. Additionally, the bill prohibits the use of the "unit rule" in sign condemnation, which previously limited compensation to the fair market value of property. Instead, sign owners will now be compensated for the sign's value, any related lease, loss in value to other signs, and the loss of the right to erect and maintain the sign. The bill also restricts the use of appraisals in jurisdictional offers, preventing the use of appraisals that differ by more than 15% from the original offer. These changes aim to provide more comprehensive protection and compensation for sign owners when their signs are affected by transportation projects.

Committee Categories

Transportation and Infrastructure

Sponsors (14)

Last Action

Available for scheduling (on 02/04/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...