summary
Introduced
01/12/2026
01/12/2026
In Committee
02/05/2026
02/05/2026
Crossed Over
01/27/2026
01/27/2026
Passed
02/11/2026
02/11/2026
Dead
Introduced Session
2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Court security. Establishes a procedure to prevent certain personal information of a protected judicial individual from being publically available by a public agency. Creates a civil cause of action against a public agency that fails to remove certain personal information of a protected individual. Repeals current code concerning the supreme court sheriff. Allows the supreme court and the court of appeals to each appoint a court marshal and allows each appointed court marshal to hire deputy court marshals. Requires a court marshal to ensure the safety and security of the court. Requires a supreme court marshal and a court of appeals court marshal to carry out certain responsibilities. Provides that a court marshal is entitled to qualified immunity for acts performed in the course of official duties. Specifies that a court marshal has limited police powers and is required to notify the local law enforcement agency as soon as practicable when a security threat is detected. Allows the marshal appointed by the court of appeals to provide for the safety and security of the tax court.
AI Summary
This bill establishes new protections for judges and their families by creating a procedure for "protected individuals," which includes current or retired judges, federal judges in Indiana, and their household members, to request that their personal information, such as home addresses, phone numbers, and Social Security numbers, be removed from public records maintained by government agencies. If a public agency fails to remove this information within three days of receiving a certified or emailed request, the protected individual can file a civil lawsuit against the agency to recover damages, legal fees, and potentially punitive damages if the refusal was willful. The bill also repeals the current law regarding the Supreme Court Sheriff and creates new roles for court security, allowing the Supreme Court to appoint a Supreme Court Marshal and the Court of Appeals to appoint a Court Marshal, both of whom can hire deputy marshals to ensure the safety and security of their respective courts and judges. These marshals will have limited police powers, including the ability to carry weapons and access certain law enforcement databases for security purposes, but they must notify local law enforcement of any detected security threats and defer arrests to them. Importantly, both Supreme Court Marshals and Court of Appeals Marshals, along with their deputies, will be entitled to qualified immunity for actions taken while performing their official duties. The Court of Appeals Marshal will also be responsible for the safety and security of the Tax Court.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (17)
Scott Baldwin (R)*,
Cyndi Carrasco (R)*,
Eric Koch (R)*,
Scott Alexander (R),
Liz Brown (R),
Brett Clark (R),
Spencer Deery (R),
Aaron Freeman (R),
Sue Glick (R),
Craig Haggard (R),
Chris Jeter (R),
Rodney Pol (D),
Lonnie Randolph (D),
Daryl Schmitt (R),
Greg Steuerwald (R),
Greg Taylor (D),
R. Michael Young (R),
Last Action
Motion to concur filed (on 02/17/2026)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...