Bill

Bill > SB269


MD SB269

MD SB269
Courts and Judicial Proceedings - Evidence - Rebuttable Presumption of Medical Bills


summary

Introduced
01/19/2026
In Committee
01/19/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

2026 Regular Session

Bill Summary

Establishing a rebuttable presumption in an action for personal injury or wrongful death that a medical bill from a health care provider or an agent of the health care provider is authentic, fair, and reasonable if the bill was properly provided in discovery; and establishing that a party may overcome the presumption that a medical bill is authentic, fair, and reasonable by proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the medical bill, or any charge in a medical bill, is not authentic, is unfair, or is unreasonable.

AI Summary

This bill establishes a "rebuttable presumption" in personal injury or wrongful death lawsuits, meaning that medical bills submitted by a healthcare provider or their agent are automatically considered authentic, fair, and reasonable, as long as they were properly shared during the discovery process, which is the formal exchange of information between parties in a lawsuit. This change aims to simplify the process of proving the validity of medical expenses in court, as expert testimony will no longer be required to establish these points for admissibility. However, the bill also allows either party to challenge this presumption by proving, with a "preponderance of the evidence" (meaning it's more likely than not), that a medical bill or any specific charge within it is not authentic, unfair, or unreasonable.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (1)

Last Action

Senate Judicial Proceedings Hearing (14:00:00 2/3/2026 ) (on 02/03/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...