Bill

Bill > HR26


US HR26

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2017


summary

Introduced
01/03/2017
In Committee
01/03/2017
Crossed Over
01/06/2017
Passed
Dead
12/31/2018

Introduced Session

115th Congress

Bill Summary

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2017 (Sec. 2) This bill states that its purpose is to increase accountability for and transparency in the federal regulatory process by requiring Congress to approve all new major regulations. (Sec. 3) The bill revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking to require federal agencies promulgating rules to: (1) identify and repeal or amend existing rules to completely offset any annual costs of new rules to the U.S. economy; and (2) publish information about the rules in the Federal Register and include in their reports to Congress and to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) a classification of the rules as major or nonmajor rules and a complete copy of the cost-benefit analysis of the rules, including an analysis of any jobs added or lost, differentiating between public and private sector jobs. A "major rule" is any rule that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget finds has resulted in or is likely to result in: (1) an annual cost on the economy of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation); (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. A joint resolution of approval of major rules must be enacted before such rules may take effect (currently, major rules take effect unless a joint resolution disapproving them is enacted). If a joint resolution of approval is not enacted by the end of 70 session days or legislative days, as applicable, after the agency proposing the rule submits its report on such rule to Congress, the major rule shall be deemed not to be approved and shall not take effect. The bill permits a major rule to take effect for one 90-calendar day period without such approval if the President determines it is necessary because of an imminent threat to health or safety or other emergency, for the enforcement of criminal laws, for national security, or to implement an international trade agreement. The bill sets forth the congressional approval procedure for major rules and the congressional disapproval procedure for nonmajor rules. Agencies are prohibited from allowing a major rule to take effect without the congressional review procedures set forth in this bill. A joint resolution addressing a report classifying a rule must be introduced as a major rule within three legislative days in the House of Representative and three session days in the Senate. The bill: (1) prohibits any amendments to such a joint resolution at any stage of the legislative process; (2) provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution of approval; and (3) requires a vote on such resolution in the Senate within 15 session days after it is reported by the committee to which it was referred, or after such committee has been discharged from further consideration of the resolution. A court may review whether an agency has completed the necessary requirements under this bill for a rule to take effect (currently, no judicial review of a determination, finding, action, or omission in the rulemaking process is subject to judicial review). The bill limits the effect of a joint resolution of approval of a major rule. The bill is inapplicable to rules that concern monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee. Any rule promulgated by a federal agency that relates to a regulatory program for a commercial, recreational, or subsistence activity related to hunting, fishing, or camping, or any rule other than a major rule for which an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, shall take effect at such time as the agency determines. Before new rules take effect, agencies must amend or repeal other rules to offset any annual costs of the new rules to the U.S. economy. Over a 10-year period, agencies must submit reports designating for congressional review all agency rules that are in effect as of one year after enactment of this bill. If Congress does not enact a joint resolution of approval for such rules, the rules shall not continue in effect. (Sec. 4) The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended to provide that any congressional approval procedure set forth in this bill affecting budget authority, outlays, or receipts shall be assumed to be effective unless it is not approved in accordance with this bill. (Sec. 5) The GAO must conduct a study to determine as of the date of enactment of this bill: (1) how many rules were in effect, (2) how many major rules were in effect, and (3) the total estimated economic cost imposed by all such rules. The GAO must report to Congress on such study within one year of the enactment of this bill.

AI Summary

This bill, the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2017, aims to increase accountability and transparency in the federal regulatory process. The key provisions are: 1. It requires Congress to approve all new major rules (defined as those with an annual economic impact of $100 million or more) before they can take effect, rather than the current system where major rules take effect unless Congress passes a joint resolution to disapprove them. 2. It requires federal agencies to identify existing rules to offset the costs of any new major rules before they can take effect. 3. It establishes expedited congressional procedures for considering joint resolutions of approval or disapproval for major and non-major rules, respectively. 4. It provides for limited judicial review to ensure agencies have complied with the requirements of the Act. 5. It exempts monetary policy rules proposed by the Federal Reserve from the Act's requirements. 6. It requires a periodic review of all existing federal regulations, with those not approved by Congress within 10 years no longer remaining in effect. Overall, the bill aims to shift more regulatory power from the executive branch to Congress by requiring their explicit approval of major new rules before implementation.

Committee Categories

Justice, Military Affairs and Security

Sponsors (161)

Doug Collins (R)* Ralph Abraham (R),  Robert Aderholt (R),  Mark Amodei (R),  Brian Babin (R),  Don Bacon (R),  Jim Banks (R),  Lou Barletta (R),  Andy Barr (R),  Joe Barton (R),  Jack Bergman (R),  Andy Biggs (R),  Gus Bilirakis (R),  Mike Bishop (R),  Rob Bishop (R),  Diane Black (R),  Marsha Blackburn (R),  Mike Bost (R),  Kevin Brady (R),  Dave Brat (R),  Mo Brooks (R),  Susan Brooks (R),  Ken Buck (R),  Larry Bucshon (R),  Michael Burgess (R),  Bradley Byrne (R),  Ken Calvert (R),  Buddy Carter (R),  Steve Chabot (R),  Jason Chaffetz (R),  Chris Collins (R),  Barbara Comstock (R),  Paul Cook (R),  Ryan Costello (R),  Kevin Cramer (R),  Rick Crawford (R),  John Culberson (R),  Rodney Davis (R),  Ron DeSantis (R),  Scott DesJarlais (R),  Sean Duffy (R),  Jeff Duncan (R),  Tom Emmer (R),  Chuck Fleischmann (R),  Bill Flores (R),  Jeff Fortenberry (R),  Rodney Frelinghuysen (R),  Matt Gaetz (R),  Bob Gibbs (R),  Louie Gohmert (R),  Bob Goodlatte (R),  Paul Gosar (R),  Garret Graves (R),  Sam Graves (R),  Tom Graves (R),  Morgan Griffith (R),  Glenn Grothman (R),  Brett Guthrie (R),  Andy Harris (R),  Vicky Hartzler (R),  Jeb Hensarling (R),  Jaime Herrera Beutler (R),  Jody Hice (R),  French Hill (R),  George Holding (R),  Trey Hollingsworth (R),  Richard Hudson (R),  Bill Huizenga (R),  Randy Hultgren (R),  Duncan Hunter (R),  Darrell Issa (R),  Evan Jenkins (R),  Lynn Jenkins (R),  Bill Johnson (R),  Sam Johnson (R),  Jim Jordan (R),  Dave Joyce (R),  John Katko (R),  Mike Kelly (R),  Trent Kelly (R),  Stephen Knight (R),  Raúl Labrador (R),  Darin LaHood (R),  Doug LaMalfa (R),  Doug Lamborn (R),  Leonard Lance (R),  Billy Long (R),  Barry Loudermilk (R),  Mia Love (R),  Frank Lucas (R),  Blaine Luetkemeyer (R),  Kenny Marchant (R),  Tom Marino (R),  Thomas Massie (R),  Michael McCaul (R),  Tom McClintock (R),  David McKinley (R),  Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R),  Martha McSally (R),  Mark Meadows (R),  Luke Messer (R),  Paul Mitchell (I),  John Moolenaar (R),  Markwayne Mullin (R),  Tim Murphy (R),  Dan Newhouse (R),  Kristi Noem (R),  Pete Olson (R),  Steven Palazzo (R),  Gary Palmer (R),  Erik Paulsen (R),  Stevan Pearce (R),  Robert Pittenger (R),  Ted Poe (R),  Bill Posey (R),  John Ratcliffe (R),  Tom Reed (R),  James Renacci (R),  David Roe (R),  Hal Rogers (R),  Todd Rokita (R),  Thomas Rooney (R),  Peter Roskam (R),  Keith Rothfus (R),  David Rouzer (R),  Edward Royce (R),  John Rutherford (R),  Mark Sanford (R),  Steve Scalise (R),  Pete Sessions (R),  John Shimkus (R),  Bill Shuster (R),  Mike Simpson (R),  Adrian Smith (R),  Jason Smith (R),  Lamar Smith (R),  Chris Stewart (R),  Steve Stivers (R),  Claudia Tenney (R),  G.T. Thompson (R),  Mac Thornberry (R),  Patrick Tiberi (R),  Scott Tipton (R),  David Trott (R),  Mike Turner (R),  Ann Wagner (R),  Tim Walberg (R),  Greg Walden (R),  Mark Walker (R),  Jackie Walorski (R),  Mimi Walters (R),  Brad Wenstrup (R),  Bruce Westerman (R),  Roger Williams (R),  Rob Wittman (R),  Rob Woodall (R),  Kevin Yoder (R),  Ted Yoho (R),  David Young (R),  Don Young (R),  Lee Zeldin (R), 

Last Action

Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 115-21. (on 03/29/2017)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...
Loading...