Photo courtesy of Unsplash: https://unsplash.com/photos/a-book-on-a-table-LPdaW746WAw
While there’s a never-ending public conversation surrounding U.S. immigration, most of the attention in major media and journalism is given to federal agencies, such as the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Congressional legislation, which impacts H-1B and OPT visa programs.
Though we can get a broad outline of immigration policy by keeping a close eye on these entities, the real-world implementation of laws in place happens at the state level.
This is because states set rules for professional licensing, employment verification, enforcement cooperation, and educational credentialing. Often, people refer to this decentralized state-to-state patchwork as the “regulatory ripple effect.” As federal visa actions come into play, each of the 50 states responds differently based on its interpretation and predicted impact.
If you’re a worker, a visa immigrant lawyer, or a business owner, it’s important to pay attention to this ripple effect for compliance’s sake.
How Federal Policy Affects Local Government
States must respond to every action of the federal government. Recently, the actions receiving the most press have to do with immigration. When a state decides to respond, there are several things it must take into account, including fiscal implications, resource allocation, public services, and more.
For example, if a DHS memo were to go out raising the minimum salary thresholds for H-1B recipients, it might influence state economic development boards to revise their job training incentives. Or if a federal bill were passed expanding the visa cap for foreign-trained nurses, it could pressure states to revise their credential standards in their given healthcare fields.
While this may sound theoretical, it’s not. States consistently make legislative, administrative, and educational changes that either reflect or resist federal direction. Not many places are more apparent than in occupational licensing and employment verification.
The Labor Market Impact Across States
The regulatory ripple has pretty clear and real economic consequences.
For example, according to data from the Economic Policy Institute, states with higher concentrations of work visa holders (e.g., California, New York, Texas) can benefit from the bigger labor supply, higher economic output, and entrepreneurial contributions of those workers. However, on the flipside, they also wrestle with the strain on public infrastructure and services, as well as localized labor competition.
In contrast, states with more restrictive immigration stances are dealing with badly understaffed essential industries, like rural healthcare, agriculture, and eldercare.
In both cases, states have to adjust their labor departments in tandem with federal law to create something that works to their benefit, such as:
● Offering subsidies for upskilling domestic workers
● Adjusting compliance standards for visa-based hires
● Cooperating or refusing to cooperate with federal audits and enforcement
Those working as US immigration lawyers must be in touch with these unique state dynamics to inform employer risk assessments and workforce planning.
Ways in Which Specific States Are Responding to Licensing, Employment, and Education
Photo courtesy of Unsplash: https://www.pexels.com/photo/crop-businessman-giving-contract-to-woman-to-sign-3760067/
While federal law sets the framework for all of the things above, it’s the states that determine how it affects real people.
As visa programs like H-2B continue to gain traction and employment-based green card reforms continue taking place, states are having to react with their own policy changes.
Licensing Board Changes
In April of 2025, a bill to provide lawful residence for advanced STEM degree holders was introduced in session. US HR2627 aims to create new pathways for international workers and students to obtain lawful permanent resident status.
These changes are now beginning to trickle down to the state legislature.
In Alaska, the governor recently signed into law House Joint Resolution 25 (HJR25), which explicitly supports the continued hiring and retention of international educators, including J-1 and H-1B visa holders. While the resolution doesn’t mandate changes to the law, it does empower school administrators to recognize foreign credentials.
Florida is also one of the many states that have begun adopting provisional credentialing pathways for teachers and healthcare professionals.
Workforce Compliance and Labor Law Adjustments
In conjunction with the H-2B program, states like Florida and Louisiana, which both heavily depend on seasonal, non-agricultural workers, are following suit with federal laws while making adjustments based on local legislature.
In Louisiana, more specifically, new unemployment insurance requirements could impact H-2B workers who lose their jobs. In both states, however, new improvements to the H-2B nonimmigrant visa program, including immediate employment and the elimination of the eligible countries list, make it easier to onboard workers right away.
In contrast to federal and state collaboration, California’s new SB48 bill prohibits school districts from cooperating with ICE unless legally required. While it may not be directly labor-related as of yet, it does reflect California’s broader sanctuary policies and how employers may follow suit in mixed-status environments.
How Visa Trends Impact Education
Work visa policy has just as much of an impact on education as it does on labor. Several states have implemented bridge programs or credential conversion initiatives to help foreign-trained professionals gain their U.S. equivalency.
California’s SB 1159 (2014) and AB 595 (2019) allow individuals to apply for state credentials using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN). This opens the door for visa holders and undocumented immigrants to apply for careers in their given profession without the need for a Social Security number.
Nevada recently adopted AB 472, which states that school districts cannot restrict partnerships with international teacher exchange programs by partnering with recruiters or program sponsors who charge more than $10,000 in fees. The bill is aimed at preserving the visa pipeline for J-1 educators by getting rid of excessive fees.
Other states, such as Washington, Illinois, and Massachusetts, have launched micro-credentialing initiatives and fast-track licensure programs for internationally educated professionals.
Depending on the state you’re looking at, it’s the lower-level education infrastructure that works to either facilitate or block applicants from successfully obtaining a visa.
Tracking the Ripple
Most of the headlines we see in the news these days are in regards to federal work. However, it’s the downstream impact in state legislatures, school systems, and licensing agencies that have the greatest impact on our country’s visa holders and employers.
Every state has the ability to create its own interpretation of federal immigration frameworks, and the way they interpret them can greatly influence job placement, licensing eligibility, and legal compliance.
As an employer, educator, or professional of any kind, it’s important to know how your state is reacting to the federal immigration system. This is especially true for visa immigration lawyers, who want to make sure their clients both obtain their visas and use them to build meaningful careers.
Jordan McDowell
Writer & Content Strategist
Philadelphia, PA