summary
Introduced
12/01/2025
12/01/2025
In Committee
02/20/2026
02/20/2026
Crossed Over
02/17/2026
02/17/2026
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2025-2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
This bill adopts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA) approved by the Uniform Law Commission in 2020. The bill allows a person served with a complaint in a civil action to file an expedited special motion to dismiss any cause of action asserted against the person based on the person’s 1) communication in a governmental proceeding; communication on an issue under consideration or review in a governmental proceeding; or 3) exercise of the constitutional right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, on a matter of public concern. In general, the court must hold a hearing on a special motion to dismiss within 60 days of its filing and must stay the court proceedings, including discovery, until the court rules on the special motion and the time to appeal this ruling has expired. The court must rule on the special motion not later than 60 days after the hearing, and the appeal period is 14 days from the ruling. In ruling on the motion, the court must consider the pleadings, the motion, any reply or response to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in a summary judgment proceeding. The court must dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if all of the following apply: 1. The moving party establishes that the cause of action is as described in items 1 to 3 above. 2. The responding party fails to establish the applicability of certain excluded situations, such as the cause of action being brought against a governmental unit or employee acting in an official capacity or against a person whose communication relates to the sale of goods or services. 3. The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each element of the cause of action or the moving party establishes either that the responding party failed to state a cause of action or that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A moving party has a right to appeal an order denying a special motion to dismiss. A court must award court costs, reasonable attorney fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the special motion as follows: 1) to the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion, or 2) to the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding.
AI Summary
This bill adopts the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), which creates a legal mechanism to quickly dismiss lawsuits that potentially infringe on constitutional rights of free speech, press, assembly, and association. The bill allows a person served with a civil complaint to file a special motion to dismiss the case if the lawsuit stems from their communication in a governmental proceeding, discussion of a governmental issue, or exercise of constitutional rights on a matter of public concern. The motion must be filed within 60 days of being served, and the court is required to hold a hearing within 60 days and issue a ruling within 60 days after the hearing. During this process, most court proceedings and discovery are stayed. If the person filing the motion can demonstrate that the lawsuit falls under the protected categories and the responding party cannot establish a prima facie case, the court must dismiss the cause of action with prejudice. The bill also provides that the prevailing party can be awarded court costs and attorney fees, with the moving party receiving fees if they win and the responding party receiving fees only if the motion was frivolous or intended to delay proceedings. Importantly, the law is designed to be broadly interpreted to protect constitutional rights and promote uniformity across states that adopt similar legislation.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (13)
Elijah Behnke (R)*,
Lindee Brill (R)*,
Barbara Dittrich (R)*,
Joy Goeben (R)*,
Rick Gundrum (R)*,
Joel Kitchens (R)*,
Dan Knodl (R)*,
Rob Kreibich (R)*,
Dave Maxey (R)*,
Paul Melotik (R)*,
Jerry O'Connor (R)*,
Jim Piwowarczyk (R)*,
Eric Wimberger (R),
Last Action
Available for scheduling (on 02/20/2026)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/proposals/reg/asm/bill/ab701 |
| AB701 ROCP for Committee on Judiciary | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/related/records/assembly/judiciary/1964239.pdf |
| BillText | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/proposaltext/2025/REG/AB701.pdf |
Loading...