Bill

Bill > A119


NJ A119

NJ A119
Establishes rebuttable presumption that person charged with theft of motor vehicle be detained prior to trial under certain circumstances.


summary

Introduced
01/13/2026
In Committee
01/13/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead

Introduced Session

2026-2027 Regular Session

Bill Summary

This bill establishes a rebuttable presumption that a person charged with theft of a motor vehicle is subject to pretrial detention if, during the course of the theft, the person engaged in conduct that caused death or serious bodily injury to another person or engaged in conduct which created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person. Under current law, a person is guilty of theft of a motor vehicle if the person unlawfully takes, or exercises unlawful control over, another person's motor vehicle with the purpose to deprive that person of the motor vehicle. Theft of a motor vehicle is a crime of the third degree. A crime of the third degree is punishable by up to five years imprisonment, a fine of up to $15,000, or both. Additionally under current law, courts are authorized to order the pretrial release of a defendant pending further proceedings, or order pretrial detention of defendants who are found to be a flight risk, a danger to another or the community, or likely to obstruct further criminal proceedings. The bill provides that if, upon motion by the prosecutor, the court finds probable cause a defendant committed theft of a motor vehicle, and during the course of the theft engaged in conduct that caused death or serious bodily injury to another person or engaged in conduct which created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person, there would be a rebuttable presumption that the person be detained pending trial because no amount of monetary bail, non-monetary conditions of release, or combination thereof would reasonably assure the safety of any other person or the community. The presumption may be rebutted by the defendant upon a showing of a preponderance of the evidence in support of the defendant. Under current law, this rebuttable presumption applies when the court finds probable cause that the defendant committed murder or any crime for which the defendant would be subject to an ordinary or extended term of life imprisonment.

AI Summary

This bill establishes a rebuttable presumption that a person charged with theft of a motor vehicle should be detained before trial if, during the commission of the theft, they caused death or serious bodily injury to another person, or created a substantial risk of such harm. "Serious bodily injury" is defined as bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death, causes serious permanent disfigurement, or results in the protracted loss or impairment of the function of any body part. Currently, courts can order pretrial detention if a defendant is a flight risk or a danger to the community, but this bill adds a specific circumstance for motor vehicle theft. Under this bill, if a prosecutor shows probable cause that a defendant committed motor vehicle theft and engaged in the specified dangerous conduct, there is a presumption that no amount of bail or release conditions can ensure public safety, leading to pretrial detention. This presumption can be overcome by the defendant if they can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that release conditions would be sufficient. This new provision is added to existing laws that allow for pretrial detention in other serious criminal cases, such as murder or crimes punishable by life imprisonment.

Committee Categories

Justice

Sponsors (3)

Last Action

Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee (on 01/13/2026)

bill text


bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...

bill summary

Loading...