summary
Introduced
09/26/2025
09/26/2025
In Committee
01/14/2026
01/14/2026
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2025-2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
This bill updates the current statutory rule of evidence relating to testimony by experts to conform with recent changes made to Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702 intended to clarify the court[s gatekeeping role with respect to expert testimony. Current law parallels FRE 702 prior to its amendment, allowing the testimony of an expert witness if the witness[s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact at issue in the case, but limiting the testimony of an expert witness to testimony that is based on sufficient facts or data, that is the product of reliable principles and methods, and that is based on the witness applying those principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. Similar to the changes made to FRE 702, the bill confirms that the proponent of the testimony is required to demonstrate to the court that it is more likely than not that the witness[s testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, that it is the product of reliable principles and methods, and, finally, that the witness[s opinion reflects a reliable application of those principles and methods to the facts of the case.
AI Summary
This bill updates Wisconsin's statute on expert witness testimony to align with recent changes in Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 702, focusing on clarifying the court's role in evaluating expert testimony. Specifically, the bill modifies the existing law by requiring the proponent of expert testimony to demonstrate to the court that it is "more likely than not" that the testimony meets three key criteria: (1) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness's opinion reflects a reliable application of those principles and methods to the facts of the case. The primary change is shifting the language from stating that a witness "has applied" principles reliably to requiring that the witness's "opinion reflects a reliable application" of those principles. This modification aims to strengthen the court's gatekeeping function in determining the admissibility of expert testimony, ensuring that such testimony is scientifically sound, methodologically rigorous, and appropriately applied to the specific case at hand. The bill will apply to all actions or special proceedings commenced on or after its effective date.
Committee Categories
Justice
Sponsors (16)
Cindi Duchow (R)*,
Brent Jacobson (R)*,
Rob Kreibich (R)*,
Clint Moses (R)*,
Dave Murphy (R)*,
Jeff Mursau (R)*,
Jerry O'Connor (R)*,
William Penterman (R)*,
Jim Piwowarczyk (R)*,
Paul Tittl (R)*,
Nancy VanderMeer (R)*,
Robert Wittke (R)*,
Dan Feyen (R),
Howard Marklein (R),
Van Wanggaard (R),
Eric Wimberger (R),
Last Action
Laid on the table (on 01/22/2026)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
| Document Type | Source Location |
|---|---|
| State Bill Page | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/proposals/reg/asm/bill/ab458 |
| AB458 ROCP for Committee on Judiciary | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/related/records/assembly/judiciary/1953327.pdf |
| BillText | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/proposaltext/2025/REG/AB458.pdf |
Loading...