summary
Introduced
05/30/2025
05/30/2025
In Committee
05/30/2025
05/30/2025
Crossed Over
Passed
Dead
Introduced Session
2025-2026 Regular Session
Bill Summary
Under current law, if a proposed administrative rule is reasonably expected to pass along $10,000,000 or more in implementation and compliance costs to businesses, local governmental units, and individuals over any two-year period, the agency proposing the rule must stop working on the proposed rule until 1) the agency modifies the proposed rule to reduce the expected costs or 2) a bill is enacted that allows the agency to promulgate the proposed rule. These requirements do not apply to emergency rules or to certain rules proposed by the Department of Natural Resources that relate to air quality and that are required under federal law. This bill changes those requirements so that the requirements apply when a proposed rule is reasonably expected to pass along any amount of implementation and compliance costs to businesses, local governmental units, and individuals over any two-year period. Under the bill, the agency proposing such a rule must stop working on the proposed rule until 1) the agency modifies the proposed rule to eliminate the expected costs; 2) a bill is enacted that allows the agency to promulgate the proposed rule; or 3) the agency promulgates or has promulgated a different rule, in the same calendar year as proposing the rule at issue, that is reasonably expected to reduce implementation and compliance costs to businesses, local governmental units, and individuals over any two-year period, in an amount that will offset the amount of costs resulting from the proposed rule at issue. The bill also requires an agency, in the economic impact analysis of a proposed rule that the agency is required to prepare, to include an estimate of the total implementation and compliance cost savings that are reasonably expected to be realized by businesses, local governmental units, and individuals as a result of the proposed rule, expressed as a single dollar figure.
AI Summary
This bill modifies administrative rule-making requirements in Wisconsin, lowering the threshold for when an agency must stop working on a proposed rule due to potential economic costs. Previously, agencies were required to halt rule development only if implementation and compliance costs were expected to exceed $10 million over two years; now, the bill mandates that agencies stop work if any amount of implementation and compliance costs are anticipated. The bill requires agencies to provide a more detailed economic impact analysis that includes both costs and potential cost savings, expressed as a single dollar figure. Agencies can proceed with rule-making if they either modify the proposed rule to eliminate expected costs, obtain legislative approval through a bill, or promulgate a different rule in the same calendar year that is expected to offset the costs of the original proposed rule. The bill also establishes new guidelines for how agencies must calculate and attribute implementation and compliance costs, including considering factors such as statutory directives, federal law requirements, and other constraints that might impact the rule's policies. These changes aim to provide more transparency and financial accountability in the state's administrative rule-making process, ensuring that proposed rules are thoroughly evaluated for their potential economic impact on businesses, local governments, and individuals.
Sponsors (36)
David Armstrong (R)*,
Elijah Behnke (R)*,
Robert Brooks (R)*,
Calvin Callahan (R)*,
Alex Dallman (R)*,
Barbara Dittrich (R)*,
Robert Donovan (R)*,
Joy Goeben (R)*,
Chanz Green (R)*,
Rick Gundrum (R)*,
Nate Gustafson (R)*,
Brent Jacobson (R)*,
Dean Kaufert (R)*,
Dan Knodl (R)*,
Rob Kreibich (R)*,
Scott Krug (R)*,
Dave Maxey (R)*,
Paul Melotik (R)*,
Dave Murphy (R)*,
Jeff Mursau (R)*,
Amanda Nedweski (R)*,
Jerry O'Connor (R)*,
William Penterman (R)*,
Jim Piwowarczyk (R)*,
Paul Tittl (R)*,
Travis Tranel (R)*,
Chuck Wichgers (R)*,
Robert Wittke (R)*,
Julian Bradley (R),
Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R),
Dan Feyen (R),
Rob Hutton (R),
Chris Kapenga (R),
Steve Nass (R),
Romaine Quinn (R),
Cory Tomczyk (R),
Last Action
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Accountability, and Transparency (on 05/30/2025)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Document Type | Source Location |
---|---|
State Bill Page | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/proposals/reg/asm/bill/ab277 |
BillText | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/proposaltext/2025/REG/AB277.pdf |
Loading...